Canon powershot g1 x mark ii cena full#

Portable, all-in one PowerShot and IXUS cameras ranging from expert creative compacts to superzooms and easy point and shoot options. But in order to make sure it doesn't compete with their SLRs, they priced it 3X as high.

Canon powershot g1 x mark ii cena full#

It never seems to be mentioned, only the sensor size and final image file size, which is pretty meanlingless.ДЄ fixed lens, full frame sensor, camera like this for landscaping, Night photography, panoramic, macro etc.ДЇrom Canon? No way It would undercut their reflex full frame sells That's why Sony are probably laughing in their corner. Can anyone tell me what dpi is generated by the sensor in this compact? Ie isetc. Perhaps if you had the camera you would speak differently. Go to comparometer and compare ir with a Nikon D aps sensor camera and get back to me. High Noise floor? Where did you hear that? I own this camera and have no idea what you speak of. Or just go ahead and get a competing product with a smaller sensor. III, which will likely have a newer Sony sensor. The reported flaws in this mark ii version will not bother me and I'll probably get the viewfinder as I use the VF-4 on my E-P5 Olympus which works better in bright light. I had the original G1x and loved the quality of the images but it was a flawed camera, much improved in the mark 2 version. Always wanted this camera but it was overpriced to me. I have used both and the RX is great for a pocket camera but for sheer image quality, don't tell me it's better when it is not.

Writer shows his bias to Sony or dislike for Canon. Seriously, you sum up by saying the Sony RX produces better still images? It may have more resolution due to a higher pixel count but that comes at a cost, a very slight blurring to compensate for the too many pixels in a 1 inch sensor.

IMHO, the new programming seems to hit the len's sweet-spot better. The Mark II lens is a little softer in the corners when wide open and is almost unusable at F2. The optical quality of the lens on the original was superb wide open in almost all settings. I also have the Mark I version of this camera. Oxymoron alert: in the first paragraph in the 'Final Word' section, the phrase 'optical EVF' appears.